Before comparing your score with a friend’s result or a watch estimate, establish whether you are comparing the same thing.
What is being measured?
During exercise, oxygen moves from your lungs into the blood, is carried by the circulation and is used by working muscles. Cardiorespiratory fitness reflects how these linked systems support physical activity. It is not simply a measure of heart strength.
VO₂ describes the rate at which oxygen is being used. In a direct exercise test, equipment measures the gases you breathe while the workload increases. The highest oxygen uptake achieved can be reported as VO₂ peak.
VO₂ max refers to maximal oxygen uptake established under the test’s criteria. A demanding test does not automatically prove that a physiological maximum was reached. A good report should identify the measure and explain the test context rather than use “peak”, “max” and “estimate” interchangeably.
Direct tests and estimates answer the question differently
Scroll to see all columns.
| Method | What happens | How to use the result |
|---|---|---|
| Direct measurement | A mask or mouthpiece connects to gas analysis equipment during exercise. | Interpret alongside the protocol, effort, symptoms and other recorded measures. |
| Submaximal exercise estimate | Performance or physiological response in a defined test is entered into a prediction equation. | Treat it as an estimate whose accuracy depends on the method and its assumptions. |
| Wearable estimate | A device applies an algorithm to information such as exercise data and heart rate. | Use it with an understanding of device validation and individual uncertainty. |
A submaximal test is performed below maximal effort. It can be useful when it is suitable and repeatable. Direct measurement can add information, but it is not automatically necessary for every person who wants to exercise more effectively.
What happens in a direct test?
A typical graded test begins at a manageable workload and becomes more demanding on a treadmill or cycle. The provider selects the protocol and monitoring according to the purpose of the test and the person being tested.
Preparation, resting measurements, the increasing workload and recovery are all part of the process. The test is not simply a competition to continue until you cannot move. Tell the provider about your medicines and any recent change in health. Follow their preparation instructions; do not stop prescribed medication to achieve a different heart rate.
A clinical cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) may investigate exercise limitation using several physiological measurements. A fitness testing service and a medically directed investigation should not be assumed to offer the same diagnostic assessment. Ask who performs and interprets the test, what is monitored and what happens if an unexpected finding occurs.
Read the units before judging the score
Your result may be expressed in litres per minute, written as L/min, or relative to body mass as mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹.
Here is a worked example using made up numbers for the calculation:
Scroll to see all columns.
| Measurement | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen uptake | 2.8 L/min × 1,000 | 2,800 mL/min |
| Relative value at 80 kg | 2,800 ÷ 80 | 35.0 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹ |
| The same oxygen uptake at 75 kg | 2,800 ÷ 75 | 37.3 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹ |
In the last row, the absolute oxygen uptake has not improved. The relative number is higher because the body mass used in the calculation is lower.
This is not a recommendation to lose weight to improve a score. It shows why body mass, absolute capacity and physical function need to be considered together. A change in the headline number is not always a change in the underlying oxygen uptake.
What counts as a “good” result?
A comparison needs an appropriate reference group and a matching method. Age, sex, body size, test equipment and exercise mode can affect the interpretation. A cycle test and a treadmill test should not simply be ranked using the same chart without checking suitability.
A 2026 European Respiratory Society task force analysed data from 5,956 healthy people across 17 sites. Differences in testing methods and results were substantial enough to prevent the creation of the intended global reference ranges.
That does not make every reference chart useless. It means the source and applicability of a classification matter. “Average for age” and “sufficient for my goal” are also different questions. A score can be compared with a reference population while the exercise plan remains focused on what you need to do.
Ask which reference was used and whether it fits your test. Be cautious of a percentile with no named source or a universal target presented as the right number for everyone.
How much confidence should you place in a watch estimate?
The INTERLIVE review examined 14 studies of consumer wearable estimates. Estimates based on exercise data performed better on average than those based on resting information, but agreement for individuals was much wider than the average error suggested.
In other words, a device can be close to the laboratory average across a group while being noticeably wrong for a particular person. The review also cannot validate every device or software update released since the included studies.
A watch estimate can be a prompt to look more closely at your activity and trends. Do not treat it as a diagnosis, a precise laboratory result or evidence of a sudden health change on its own.
How the result can become a training decision
A useful report should help answer a practical question. For example, someone who fades during longer walks might need to build consistent aerobic activity and monitor effort on a repeatable route. An experienced athlete may have a different question about training intensity or sport performance.
Where test quality permits, additional exercise response information can help guide intensity. The provider should explain what was actually measured rather than infer detailed training zones from a peak score alone.
Away from formal testing, the talk test can help describe effort: moderate activity generally allows conversation but not singing; vigorous activity makes more than a few words difficult. It is a general guide, not a substitute for medical limits or assessment of symptoms.
A review can combine training completed, effort at a familiar workload and repeat testing when useful. Repeating a different method under different conditions makes the comparison harder to interpret.
Why fitness matters for health
A 2024 overview of cohort research found consistent associations between higher cardiorespiratory fitness and better health outcomes. The certainty of evidence varied, and the results describe associations rather than proof that a particular test or training program causes a specific lifespan increase.
The useful takeaway is to develop and maintain fitness, not to chase a score while ignoring symptoms, strength, recovery or medical risk factors.
New exercise symptoms need appropriate review. Severe chest pain, or chest pain with breathlessness, dizziness or a cold sweat, requires 000, not a fitness test booking.
Five questions to take to your testing provider
Ask whether the result is measured or estimated, which protocol is being used, how any classification is chosen, what the result will change and how a future comparison would be made.
For Longevico, direct VO₂ testing within the Health Review is provided externally when safe and suitable. Do not assume it is an in clinic test or an automatic inclusion in a focused assessment.
Explore the Clinical Exercise Assessment to discuss the fitness question that needs answering. The Health Review is a separate option when several areas need to be considered together.
Related reading
Strength and fitness after 40 · See how results become a plan
Evidence and further reading
- Ross R, et al. Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign. A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134:e653–e699. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461. Read source
- DeCato TW, Haverkamp H, Hegewald MJ. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET). American Thoracic Society Patient Education Series. 2020; online version updated April 2025. Read source
- Radtke T, et al. ERS statement on standardisation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in chronic lung diseases. European Respiratory Review. 2019;28(154):180101. doi:10.1183/16000617.0101-2018. Read source
- Radtke T, et al. ERS technical standard on reference values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing: summary report and a call for action. European Respiratory Journal. 2026;67(6):2502463. doi:10.1183/13993003.02463-2025. Read source
- Molina-Garcia P, et al. Validity of Estimating the Maximal Oxygen Consumption by Consumer Wearables: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Expert Statement of the INTERLIVE Network. Sports Medicine. 2022;52:1577–1597. doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01639-y. Read source
- Lang JJ, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong and consistent predictor of morbidity and mortality among adults: an overview of meta-analyses representing over 20.9 million observations from 199 unique cohort studies. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2024;58(10):556–566. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-107849. Read source
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How to Measure Physical Activity Intensity. Updated 4 December 2025. Read source
- Healthdirect Australia. Chest pain. Reviewed September 2025. Read source